Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank of Pulaski vs Lawrenceburg Federal Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank of Pulaski | Lawrenceburg Federal Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 63 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 86 |
| Earnings | 76 (stronger) | 49 |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 (stronger) | 54 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 63rd |
| Total assets | $1.5B | $95.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $74.8M |
| Capital ratio | 11.32% | 18.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.24% (stronger) | 0.41% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.09% |
| Return on assets | 1.40% (stronger) | 0.73% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.3% (stronger) | 106.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 29.7% | 9.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.6% | — |
Lawrenceburg Federal Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Pulaski leads on 4 and Lawrenceburg Federal Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.