Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Security Bank vs The Nodaway Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Security Bank | The Nodaway Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 65 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 30 | 66 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 86 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 86 (stronger) | 80 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 26th | 98th |
| Total assets | $61.9M | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $56.9M | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 7.96% | 11.56% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.43% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.26% | -0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.06% | 2.23% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.4% | 73.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.1% (stronger) | 21.2% |
| Offices | 2 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 5.8% |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Security Bank leads on 1 and The Nodaway Valley Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.