Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First United National Bank vs Altoona First Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First United National Bank | Altoona First Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 59 | 60 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 32 | 91 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 70 (stronger) | 4 |
| Earnings | 46 | 55 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 98 (stronger) | 87 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 (stronger) | 75 |
| Peer percentile | 17th | 19th |
| Total assets | $385.8M | $328.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $362.6M | $278.8M |
| Capital ratio | 8.16% | 14.14% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.91% (stronger) | 2.87% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% | 0.03% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.65% | 0.87% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 56.4% (stronger) | 73.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.9% | 5.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Altoona First Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (60 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First United National Bank leads on 2 and Altoona First Savings Bank on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.