Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
FirstBank of Nebraska vs Tecumseh Federal Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | FirstBank of Nebraska | Tecumseh Federal Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 83 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 70 | 94 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 94 (stronger) | 31 |
| Funding & liquidity | 88 | 89 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 73rd |
| Total assets | $498.1M | $53.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $390.1M | $36.3M |
| Capital ratio | 11.19% | 21.26% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.89% | 0.17% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% | -0.09% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.85% (stronger) | 0.26% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 59.9% (stronger) | 71.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.8% | 10.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.8% | — |
Tecumseh Federal Bank has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), FirstBank of Nebraska leads on 2 and Tecumseh Federal Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.