Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
FNB Washington vs Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | FNB Washington | Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 85 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 67 |
| Loan quality | 94 | 97 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 97 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 | 70 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 88th |
| Total assets | $87.8M | $295.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $57.4M | $250.6M |
| Capital ratio | 25.88% (stronger) | 11.73% |
| Problem loans | 0.18% | 0.08% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% | -0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.94% | 2.17% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 70.7% (stronger) | 76.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.8% | 27.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 2.4% |
FNB Washington has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), FNB Washington leads on 3 and Kaw Valley State Bank and Trust Company on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.