Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Foresight Bank vs Think Mutual Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Foresight Bank | Think Mutual Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 41 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 67 (stronger) | 45 |
| Funding & liquidity | 56 | 95 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 40 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 3rd | 97th |
| Total assets | $433.8M | $2.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $345.3M | $1.9B |
| Capital ratio | 10.20% | 16.25% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 3.04% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.14% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.18% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 101.1% | 64.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.0% | 5.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.3% | 12.2% |
Think Mutual Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 41). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Foresight Bank leads on 1 and Think Mutual Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.