TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Forest Park National Bank and Trust Company vs Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Bank

Forest Park National Bank and Trust Company

Forest Park, Illinois · $100 million – $1 billion

39of 100
Low

Credit union

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureForest Park National Bank and Trust CompanyIsrael Methcomm Federal Credit Union
TellerScore39100 (stronger)
Capital cushion33100 (stronger)
Loan quality17100 (stronger)
Earnings56100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity54100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage56100 (stronger)
Peer percentile2nd100th
Total assets$322.4M$2.0M
Deposits / shares$288.0M$1.4M
Capital ratio8.32%15.53% (stronger)
Problem loans2.48%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.00% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.91%3.21% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits86.7%35.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits32.9%0.0% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)2.3%—

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 39). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Forest Park National Bank and Trust Company leads on 1 and Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions