Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Fort McClellan Credit Union vs Eco Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Fort McClellan Credit Union | Eco Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 72 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 77 (stronger) | 68 |
| Loan quality | 61 | 71 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 27 | 47 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 92 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 45th | 57th |
| Total assets | $224.1M | $195.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $201.7M | $179.7M |
| Capital ratio | 12.73% (stronger) | 11.78% |
| Problem loans | 1.17% | 0.86% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.70% | 0.28% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.18% | 0.66% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 48.8% (stronger) | 55.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.0% (stronger) | 3.7% |
| Offices | 5 | 7 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.0% |
Eco Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fort McClellan Credit Union leads on 3 and Eco Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.