Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Forte Bank vs Spring Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Forte Bank | Spring Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 (stronger) | 51 |
| Capital cushion | 56 | 66 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 10 |
| Earnings | 64 | 81 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 (stronger) | 39 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 63 |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 8th |
| Total assets | $404.5M | $440.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $336.3M | $332.3M |
| Capital ratio | 10.56% | 11.57% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 2.70% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.11% | 1.54% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 99.1% (stronger) | 109.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.5% (stronger) | 25.8% |
| Offices | 4 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.3% | — |
Forte Bank has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Forte Bank leads on 5 and Spring Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.