Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Fortress Bank vs International Bank of Chicago
Metric by metric
| Measure | Fortress Bank | International Bank of Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 47 | 82 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 75 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 34 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 54 | 93 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 (stronger) | 46 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 70 | 91 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 5th | 82nd |
| Total assets | $897.2M | $982.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $686.5M | $863.0M |
| Capital ratio | 9.12% | 12.54% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.99% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.71% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.85% | 1.82% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 99.4% | 85.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.3% (stronger) | 41.4% |
| Offices | 9 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | 8.1% |
International Bank of Chicago has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 47). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fortress Bank leads on 1 and International Bank of Chicago on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.