Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Fortuna Bank vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Fortuna Bank | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 96 |
| Earnings | 0 | 58 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 76 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 56th | 97th |
| Total assets | $57.3M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $38.0M | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 34.14% (stronger) | 14.49% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Return on assets | -3.90% | 0.95% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.3% | 62.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.3% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fortuna Bank leads on 3 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.