TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Frandsen Bank & Trust vs Citizens Bank Minnesota

Bank

Frandsen Bank & Trust

Lonsdale, Minnesota · $1 billion – $10 billion

71of 100
Strong

Bank

Citizens Bank Minnesota

New Ulm, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

70of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureFrandsen Bank & TrustCitizens Bank Minnesota
TellerScore71 (stronger)70
Capital cushion50 (stronger)43
Loan quality7699 (stronger)
Earnings93 (stronger)54
Funding & liquidity6278 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage89100 (stronger)
Peer percentile63rd43rd
Total assets$3.7B$596.0M
Deposits / shares$3.1B$498.7M
Capital ratio10.02% (stronger)9.33%
Problem loans0.71%0.02% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.11%-0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.82% (stronger)0.85%
Loans ÷ deposits79.5% (stronger)80.5%
Uninsured deposits31.8%16.9% (stronger)
Offices396
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)7.9%5.1%

Frandsen Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Frandsen Bank & Trust leads on 4 and Citizens Bank Minnesota on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions