Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Frandsen Bank & Trust vs PrinsBank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Frandsen Bank & Trust | PrinsBank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 71 | 85 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 50 | 70 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 76 | 90 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 77 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 63rd | 88th |
| Total assets | $3.7B | $308.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $3.1B | $262.9M |
| Capital ratio | 10.02% | 11.99% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.71% | 0.29% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.11% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Return on assets | 1.82% | 2.99% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.5% | 68.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 31.8% | 29.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 39 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.9% | — |
PrinsBank has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 71). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Frandsen Bank & Trust leads on 1 and PrinsBank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.