Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Frontier Bank vs San Luis Valley Federal Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Frontier Bank | San Luis Valley Federal Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 58 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 89 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 65 |
| Funding & liquidity | 79 (stronger) | 66 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 91st |
| Total assets | $436.4M | $390.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $388.9M | $317.9M |
| Capital ratio | 10.78% | 17.98% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.32% | 0.15% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.12% (stronger) | 1.13% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 52.8% (stronger) | 88.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 34.1% | 20.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
San Luis Valley Federal Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Frontier Bank leads on 3 and San Luis Valley Federal Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.