TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

FSNB, National Association vs Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Bank

FSNB, National Association

Lawton, Oklahoma · $100 million – $1 billion

96of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureFSNB, National AssociationGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union
TellerScore96 (stronger)86
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality88100 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)68
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)50
Problem-loan coverage92100 (stronger)
Peer percentile99th80th
Total assets$478.3M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$369.7M$848K
Capital ratio17.51%52.15% (stronger)
Problem loans0.36%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.02%-0.32% (stronger)
Return on assets3.46% (stronger)1.21%
Loans ÷ deposits39.2% (stronger)122.2%
Uninsured deposits8.2%0.0% (stronger)
Offices661
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

FSNB, National Association has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 86). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), FSNB, National Association leads on 3 and Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions