Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
FSNB, National Association vs Hiwassee River Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | FSNB, National Association | Hiwassee River Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 96 (stronger) | 74 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 59 |
| Loan quality | 88 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 36 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 99th | 49th |
| Total assets | $478.3M | $27.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $369.7M | $24.4M |
| Capital ratio | 17.51% (stronger) | 10.94% |
| Problem loans | 0.36% | 0.15% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.02% | 0.23% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 3.46% (stronger) | 0.40% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 39.2% (stronger) | 47.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 8.2% | 4.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 66 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
FSNB, National Association has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), FSNB, National Association leads on 4 and Hiwassee River Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.