Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
FSNB, National Association vs Lawrence Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | FSNB, National Association | Lawrence Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 96 (stronger) | 69 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 48 |
| Loan quality | 88 | 94 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 62 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 63 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 94 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 99th | 53rd |
| Total assets | $478.3M | $3.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $369.7M | $2.6B |
| Capital ratio | 17.51% (stronger) | 9.78% |
| Problem loans | 0.36% | 0.17% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.02% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 3.46% (stronger) | 1.04% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 39.2% (stronger) | 85.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 8.2% (stronger) | 25.9% |
| Offices | 66 | 28 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 11.8% |
FSNB, National Association has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), FSNB, National Association leads on 5 and Lawrence Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.