Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Gala Bank vs Portrait Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Gala Bank | Portrait Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 0 | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 51 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 48th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $44.9M | $44.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $35.5M | $594K |
| Capital ratio | 22.07% | 99.23% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | -1.98% (stronger) | -8.27% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 62.2% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 57.1% | 18.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Portrait Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 73). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Gala Bank leads on 1 and Portrait Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.