Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Gideon Federal Credit Union vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Gideon Federal Credit Union | Abbott Laboratories Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 38 | 58 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 24th | 97th |
| Total assets | $269K | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $218K | $981.6M |
| Capital ratio | 18.63% (stronger) | 14.49% |
| Problem loans | 4.45% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Return on assets | 0.45% | 0.95% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 11.4% (stronger) | 62.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 2 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 62). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Gideon Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- North Chicago, IL