Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Glacier Bank vs Tucson Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Glacier Bank | Tucson Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 (stronger) | 65 |
| Capital cushion | 51 | 59 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 86 (stronger) | 52 |
| Earnings | 68 (stronger) | 56 |
| Funding & liquidity | 54 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 87 |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 41st |
| Total assets | $31.6B | $1.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $24.9B | $769.5M |
| Capital ratio | 10.10% | 10.94% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.42% (stronger) | 1.43% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.08% (stronger) | 2.17% |
| Return on assets | 1.20% (stronger) | 0.89% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.1% | 62.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 34.0% | 4.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 236 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 71 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 2.9 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 20.0% | — |
Glacier Bank has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Glacier Bank leads on 4 and Tucson Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.