Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Glennville Bank vs Altamaha Bank & Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Glennville Bank | Altamaha Bank & Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 74 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 52 |
| Loan quality | 64 | 89 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 82 | 82 |
| Funding & liquidity | 91 (stronger) | 69 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 57th |
| Total assets | $444.2M | $334.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $395.5M | $303.8M |
| Capital ratio | 11.02% (stronger) | 10.19% |
| Problem loans | 1.09% | 0.32% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% (stronger) | 1.87% |
| Return on assets | 1.56% (stronger) | 1.55% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 52.0% (stronger) | 80.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 23.7% (stronger) | 24.9% |
| Offices | 6 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 9.4% | — |
Altamaha Bank & Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Glennville Bank leads on 5 and Altamaha Bank & Trust Company on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.