TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Global Federal Credit Union vs Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Global Federal Credit Union

Anchorage, Alaska · Over $10 billion

53of 100
Below average

Credit union

Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union

Palmer, Alaska · $100 million – $1 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureGlobal Federal Credit UnionMatanuska Valley Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5368 (stronger)
Capital cushion4757 (stronger)
Loan quality5368 (stronger)
Earnings3952 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity6796 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage7589 (stronger)
Peer percentile19th45th
Total assets$13.0B$977.3M
Deposits / shares$11.3B$876.0M
Capital ratio9.70%10.67% (stronger)
Problem loans1.42%0.95% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.58% (stronger)0.97%
Return on assets0.48%0.81% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits93.3%64.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits9.7% (stronger)12.1%
Offices348
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)21.7%15.1%

Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Global Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Matanuska Valley Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions