Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Go Energy Financial Credit Union vs Marshland Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Go Energy Financial Credit Union | Marshland Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 68 (stronger) | 37 |
| Loan quality | 85 | 93 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 48 (stronger) | 41 |
| Funding & liquidity | 76 | 80 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 31st |
| Total assets | $152.6M | $272.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $134.1M | $248.3M |
| Capital ratio | 11.81% (stronger) | 8.66% |
| Problem loans | 0.46% | 0.22% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.08% (stronger) | 0.20% |
| Return on assets | 0.70% (stronger) | 0.52% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.5% | 79.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 10.4% | 6.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 7 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.0% |
Go Energy Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Go Energy Financial Credit Union leads on 4 and Marshland Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.