Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Golden Valley Bank vs Partners Bank of California
Metric by metric
| Measure | Golden Valley Bank | Partners Bank of California |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 73 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 43 | 67 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 58 | 71 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 23 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 50th | 53rd |
| Total assets | $604.7M | $602.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $553.2M | $509.0M |
| Capital ratio | 9.32% | 11.67% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.07% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.96% | 1.26% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 52.6% (stronger) | 97.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.9% (stronger) | 50.7% |
| Offices | 3 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Partners Bank of California has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 72). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Golden Valley Bank leads on 2 and Partners Bank of California on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.