Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Goppert Financial Bank vs The Nodaway Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Goppert Financial Bank | The Nodaway Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 51 | 66 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 72 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 | 80 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 64th | 98th |
| Total assets | $312.0M | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $269.3M | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 10.07% | 11.56% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.30% | 2.23% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 74.5% | 73.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.3% | 21.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 5.8% |
The Nodaway Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 76). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Goppert Financial Bank leads on 0 and The Nodaway Valley Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.