TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greater Central Texas Federal Credit Union vs Covenant Savings Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Greater Central Texas Federal Credit Union

Killeen, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

Covenant Savings Federal Credit Union

Killeen, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

72of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGreater Central Texas Federal Credit UnionCovenant Savings Federal Credit Union
TellerScore80 (stronger)72
Capital cushion6375 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)44
Earnings5384 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)87
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)83
Peer percentile65th44th
Total assets$34.2M$4.2M
Deposits / shares$30.2M$3.6M
Capital ratio11.30%12.48% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.69%
Net charge-offs0.16%0.14% (stronger)
Return on assets0.83%1.59% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits26.4% (stronger)73.3%
Uninsured deposits3.8%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greater Central Texas Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greater Central Texas Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Covenant Savings Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions