Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union vs Iron Workers Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Iron Workers Federal Credit Union
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union | Iron Workers Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 93 (stronger) | 44 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 10 |
| Loan quality | 87 (stronger) | 64 |
| Earnings | 83 (stronger) | 5 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 4th |
| Total assets | $76.7M | $5.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $64.6M | $5.1M |
| Capital ratio | 15.35% (stronger) | 6.04% |
| Problem loans | 0.40% (stronger) | 1.09% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.19% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.57% (stronger) | -0.37% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 38.3% | 31.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.8% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 44). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Iron Workers Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.