TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union vs Penn Hills Municipal Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Penn Hills Municipal Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureGreater Pittsburgh Federal Credit UnionPenn Hills Municipal Federal Credit Union
TellerScore93 (stronger)66
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality87 (stronger)0
Earnings83 (stronger)60
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)91
Peer percentile94th32nd
Total assets$76.7M$2.3M
Deposits / shares$64.6M$1.7M
Capital ratio15.35%27.46% (stronger)
Problem loans0.40% (stronger)4.35%
Net charge-offs0.19%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.57% (stronger)1.00%
Loans ÷ deposits38.3% (stronger)41.2%
Uninsured deposits0.8%0.0% (stronger)
Offices61
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Penn Hills Municipal Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions