TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union vs Metropolitan Teachers Credit Union

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Metropolitan Teachers Credit Union

Nashville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

48of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit UnionMetropolitan Teachers Credit Union
TellerScore86 (stronger)48
Capital cushion100 (stronger)84
Loan quality100 (stronger)0
Earnings68 (stronger)0
Funding & liquidity50100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)76
Peer percentile80th7th
Total assets$1.8M$2.5M
Deposits / shares$848K$2.1M
Capital ratio52.15% (stronger)13.40%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)6.02%
Net charge-offs-0.32% (stronger)7.84%
Return on assets1.21% (stronger)-10.18%
Loans ÷ deposits122.2%33.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 48). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union leads on 5 and Metropolitan Teachers Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions