TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union vs Wcg Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Wcg Employees Credit Union

Martin, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit UnionWcg Employees Credit Union
TellerScore8689 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100100
Earnings68 (stronger)59
Funding & liquidity5084 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile80th87th
Total assets$1.8M$1.0M
Deposits / shares$848K$797K
Capital ratio52.15% (stronger)21.80%
Problem loans0.00%0.00%
Net charge-offs-0.32% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets1.21% (stronger)0.97%
Loans ÷ deposits122.2%76.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Wcg Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 86). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union leads on 3 and Wcg Employees Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions