Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Greenville National Bank vs Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Greenville National Bank | Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 54 |
| Capital cushion | 80 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 87 (stronger) | 39 |
| Funding & liquidity | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 14 |
| Peer percentile | 90th | 13th |
| Total assets | $641.5M | $360K |
| Deposits / shares | $541.5M | $290K |
| Capital ratio | 13.02% | 18.47% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.05% (stronger) | 24.93% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.68% (stronger) | 0.47% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.8% | 42.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 23.0% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 10.8% | — |
Greenville National Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Greenville National Bank leads on 3 and Wright-Dunbar Area Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.