Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Guardian Savings Bank vs Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association
Bank
Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association
Paris, Kentucky · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Guardian Savings Bank | Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 (stronger) | 79 |
| Capital cushion | 64 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 32 |
| Funding & liquidity | 72 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $1.4B | $58.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $40.6M |
| Capital ratio | 11.39% | 15.91% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.20% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.00% (stronger) | 0.29% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.1% (stronger) | 110.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% | 10.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.5% | — |
Guardian Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Guardian Savings Bank leads on 4 and Blue Grass Federal Savings and Loan Association on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.