Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hana Bank USA, National Association vs Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union
Los Angeles, California · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hana Bank USA, National Association | Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 56 |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 12 |
| Funding & liquidity | 23 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 88 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 16th |
| Total assets | $835.2M | $644K |
| Deposits / shares | $588.2M | $494K |
| Capital ratio | 25.41% (stronger) | 23.13% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 3.26% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.05% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.91% (stronger) | -0.19% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.8% | 57.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 69.5% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Hana Bank USA, National Association has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hana Bank USA, National Association leads on 5 and Los Angeles Lee Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.