Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hana Bank USA, National Association vs Mattel Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hana Bank USA, National Association | Mattel Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 74 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 96 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 43 |
| Funding & liquidity | 23 | 81 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 49th |
| Total assets | $835.2M | $28.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $588.2M | $24.6M |
| Capital ratio | 25.41% (stronger) | 11.39% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.05% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Return on assets | 2.91% (stronger) | 0.57% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.8% | 79.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 69.5% | 8.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Hana Bank USA, National Association has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hana Bank USA, National Association leads on 5 and Mattel Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.