TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Hana Bank USA, National Association vs United Poles Federal Credit Union

Bank

Hana Bank USA, National Association

Fort Lee, New Jersey · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

United Poles Federal Credit Union

Perth Amboy, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

28of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureHana Bank USA, National AssociationUnited Poles Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)28
Capital cushion100 (stronger)20
Loan quality100 (stronger)1
Earnings100 (stronger)41
Funding & liquidity2369 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)28
Peer percentile92nd1st
Total assets$835.2M$72.3M
Deposits / shares$588.2M$66.6M
Capital ratio25.41% (stronger)6.95%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)2.96%
Net charge-offs-0.05% (stronger)0.17%
Return on assets2.91% (stronger)0.53%
Loans ÷ deposits86.8% (stronger)91.0%
Uninsured deposits69.5%7.7% (stronger)
Offices43
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

Hana Bank USA, National Association has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 28). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hana Bank USA, National Association leads on 6 and United Poles Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions