TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Hatboro Federal Savings, FA vs Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Bank

Hatboro Federal Savings, FA

Hatboro, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

79of 100
Strong

Credit union

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureHatboro Federal Savings, FAAsbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore79100 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality79100 (stronger)
Earnings58100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity52100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage96100 (stronger)
Peer percentile75th100th
Total assets$597.8M$4.1M
Deposits / shares$444.0M$3.5M
Capital ratio24.52% (stronger)15.40%
Problem loans0.64%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.00% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets0.94%2.26% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits107.9%21.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits9.1%0.0% (stronger)
Offices42
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hatboro Federal Savings, FA leads on 2 and Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions