Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hatch Bank vs Mission Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hatch Bank | Mission Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 73 |
| Loan quality | 97 (stronger) | 95 |
| Earnings | 32 | 66 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 79 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 89th |
| Total assets | $177.5M | $7.3B |
| Deposits / shares | $41.3M | $6.3B |
| Capital ratio | 21.49% (stronger) | 12.27% |
| Problem loans | 0.10% (stronger) | 0.15% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.64% | 0.34% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.30% | 1.15% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 266.1% | 81.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% (stronger) | 6.9% |
| Offices | 1 | 18 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Mission Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hatch Bank leads on 3 and Mission Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.