Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Heartland Bank and Trust Company vs Peru Federal Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Heartland Bank and Trust Company | Peru Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 | 87 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 69 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 94 (stronger) | 91 |
| Earnings | 77 (stronger) | 51 |
| Funding & liquidity | 69 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 90th | 91st |
| Total assets | $6.7B | $208.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $5.8B | $172.8M |
| Capital ratio | 11.94% | 16.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.19% (stronger) | 0.28% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.43% (stronger) | 0.77% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 81.3% | 64.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 23.9% | 13.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 82 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 17.2% | — |
Peru Federal Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Heartland Bank and Trust Company leads on 2 and Peru Federal Savings Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.