TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Hingham Institution for Savings vs Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Hingham Institution for Savings

Hingham, Massachusetts · $1 billion – $10 billion

64of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union

Cambridge, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

97of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureHingham Institution for SavingsCambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6497 (stronger)
Capital cushion62100 (stronger)
Loan quality7496 (stronger)
Earnings7088 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity27100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage87100 (stronger)
Peer percentile33rd98th
Total assets$4.6B$10.2M
Deposits / shares$2.6B$7.7M
Capital ratio11.19%24.81% (stronger)
Problem loans0.78%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets1.24%1.71% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits149.3%40.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits35.8%0.0% (stronger)
Offices73
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 64). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hingham Institution for Savings leads on 0 and Cambridge Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions