Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Holcomb Bank vs Union Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Holcomb Bank | Union Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 38 | 45 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 91 |
| Earnings | 81 (stronger) | 32 |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 91 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 50th | 31st |
| Total assets | $304.8M | $182.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $239.4M | $166.1M |
| Capital ratio | 8.84% | 9.52% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.27% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 1.53% (stronger) | 0.31% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 95.5% | 69.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.4% | 6.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Holcomb Bank has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Holcomb Bank leads on 4 and Union Savings Bank on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.