Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Huntingdon Savings Bank vs Investment Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Huntingdon Savings Bank | Investment Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 32 | 36 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 57 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 75 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 11th | 90th |
| Total assets | $17.9M | $105.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $13.8M | $75.5M |
| Capital ratio | 22.67% (stronger) | 21.72% |
| Problem loans | 3.58% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 0.29% | 0.41% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 103.0% | 58.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.4% (stronger) | 4.4% |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 14.6% |
Investment Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Huntingdon Savings Bank leads on 3 and Investment Savings Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.