Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
IncredibleBank vs Marathon Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | IncredibleBank | Marathon Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 57 | 82 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 33 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 70 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 62 (stronger) | 51 |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 (stronger) | 47 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 82 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 16th | 82nd |
| Total assets | $2.1B | $261.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.8B | $197.8M |
| Capital ratio | 8.30% | 15.34% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.89% | 0.03% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.11% | -0.28% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.06% (stronger) | 0.78% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 89.0% (stronger) | 109.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.3% | 17.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 17 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.9% | 8.2% |
Marathon Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), IncredibleBank leads on 2 and Marathon Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Wausau, WI
- Rothschild, WI