TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Inland Valley Federal Credit Union vs Mokelumne Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Inland Valley Federal Credit Union

Fontana, California · Under $100 million in assets

65of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Mokelumne Federal Credit Union

Lodi, California · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureInland Valley Federal Credit UnionMokelumne Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6588 (stronger)
Capital cushion37100 (stronger)
Loan quality94 (stronger)88
Earnings2956 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity99100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)98
Peer percentile30th85th
Total assets$54.0M$56.9M
Deposits / shares$49.1M$46.8M
Capital ratio8.65%16.03% (stronger)
Problem loans0.18% (stronger)0.36%
Net charge-offs0.25% (stronger)0.25%
Return on assets0.23%0.89% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits39.7% (stronger)56.5%
Uninsured deposits16.5%0.0% (stronger)
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Mokelumne Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Inland Valley Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Mokelumne Federal Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions