TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Internal Revenue Employees Federal Credit Union vs Members Credit Union

Credit union

Internal Revenue Employees Federal Credit Union

Greensboro, North Carolina · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Credit union

Members Credit Union

Winston Salem, North Carolina · $100 million – $1 billion

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureInternal Revenue Employees Federal Credit UnionMembers Credit Union
TellerScore8085 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)98
Loan quality75 (stronger)73
Earnings3062 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)95
Peer percentile65th87th
Total assets$12.2M$477.1M
Deposits / shares$8.6M$404.2M
Capital ratio29.40% (stronger)14.83%
Problem loans0.75% (stronger)0.82%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)1.39%
Return on assets0.25%1.06% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits29.4% (stronger)46.5%
Uninsured deposits2.2% (stronger)3.3%
Offices316
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Members Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Internal Revenue Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Members Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions