Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
International Bank of Commerce vs Muskogee Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | International Bank of Commerce | Muskogee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 87 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 78 |
| Loan quality | 78 | 81 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 75 | 94 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 90 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 98th | 91st |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $112.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $98.9M |
| Capital ratio | 15.53% (stronger) | 12.75% |
| Problem loans | 0.66% | 0.58% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.25% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.37% | 1.84% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 54.8% | 37.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.2% | 0.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 41 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
International Bank of Commerce has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 87). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), International Bank of Commerce leads on 2 and Muskogee Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.