Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Iron Workers Savings Bank vs Applied Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Iron Workers Savings Bank | Applied Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 29 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 75 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 26th | 98th |
| Total assets | $217.5M | $274.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $191.9M | $228.6M |
| Capital ratio | 9.13% | 17.49% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.22% | 2.54% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.4% | 24.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 10.3% (stronger) | 64.1% |
| Offices | 3 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 4.3% | — |
Applied Bank has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 64). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Iron Workers Savings Bank leads on 1 and Applied Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.