TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union vs Advance Financial Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union

Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Advance Financial Federal Credit Union

Schererville, Indiana · $100 million – $1 billion

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureIsrael Methcomm Federal Credit UnionAdvance Financial Federal Credit Union
TellerScore100 (stronger)74
Capital cushion100 (stronger)81
Loan quality100 (stronger)75
Earnings100 (stronger)35
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)94
Peer percentile100th63rd
Total assets$2.0M$122.9M
Deposits / shares$1.4M$106.4M
Capital ratio15.53% (stronger)13.07%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.76%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.18%
Return on assets3.21% (stronger)0.38%
Loans ÷ deposits35.8% (stronger)57.7%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)3.1%
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Advance Financial Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions