Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union vs Great Horizons Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Great Horizons Federal Credit Union
Munster, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union | Great Horizons Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 100 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 68 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 92 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 84 |
| Peer percentile | 100th | 32nd |
| Total assets | $2.0M | $3.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4M | $2.7M |
| Capital ratio | 15.53% | 24.48% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 4.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 3.21% (stronger) | 1.20% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 35.8% (stronger) | 68.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 66). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Great Horizons Federal Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.