Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union vs St. Helena Parish Credit Union
Credit union
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union | St. Helena Parish Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 45 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 100th | 28th |
| Total assets | $2.0M | $324K |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4M | $287K |
| Capital ratio | 15.53% (stronger) | 9.50% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.35% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 3.21% (stronger) | -0.87% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 35.8% (stronger) | 51.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 64). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and St. Helena Parish Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.