TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Kinetic Federal Credit Union vs Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Kinetic Federal Credit Union

Columbus, Georgia · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union

Eufaula, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureKinetic Federal Credit UnionMead Coated Board Federal Credit Union
TellerScore66 (stronger)62
Capital cushion91100 (stronger)
Loan quality48 (stronger)0
Earnings3241 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity82100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8486 (stronger)
Peer percentile37th24th
Total assets$664.6M$40.3M
Deposits / shares$569.5M$31.1M
Capital ratio14.08%22.98% (stronger)
Problem loans1.55% (stronger)6.71%
Net charge-offs1.14%0.92% (stronger)
Return on assets0.31%0.53% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits78.3%31.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.5%1.5% (stronger)
Offices62
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)35.5%—

Kinetic Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (66 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Kinetic Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Mead Coated Board Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions